• Intervertebral disc disease
• Lumbosacral disease
• Meningitis
• Myositis
• Neuropathy
• Paresis/paralysis
• Peripheral nerve injury
• Rehabilitation
COZING-T05 pain relief laser therapy device
Laser therapy has mainly anti-inflammatory and vasoactive effects. In the medium and long term, it can positively relieve neuropathic pain.
What's the technical parameter of the COZING-T05 pain relief laser therapy device?
|
Model |
COZING-T05 |
|
Laser Type |
Class 4 Semiconductor Diodes |
|
Wavelengths |
808nm (16 diodes) + 650nm (9 diodes),the wavlength can be selected |
|
Power |
250mW (808nm), 5mW (650nm) per diode |
|
Total Output |
8W (±20%) |
|
Battery |
5000mAh lithium |
|
Modes |
Continuous/Pulse |
|
Applicability |
For Pets and Humans |
|
Safety |
Auto-shutoff, overheating protection |
What is the advantages of the COZING-T05 pain relief laser therapy device?
1.Rapid relief of muscle pain
Utilizing advanced low intensity laser technology, it effectively promotes blood circulation, reduces muscle inflammation, and quickly relieves muscle soreness after exercise.
2.Accelerated Recovery
Stimulates the deep tissues, accelerates the removal of metabolic wastes, helps muscles recover faster, shortens recovery time, and allows you to return to exercise faster.
3.Portable and easy to use
Lightweight design, easy to carry and operate. No need for professional guidance, relax your muscles anytime, anywhere.
4.Multi-purpose treatment
Suitable for all kinds of sports injuries, such as muscle strains, joint pain and sprains. Also ideal for daily muscle relaxation and pain relief.
5.Safe and no side effects
Medical grade laser equipment, safe to use, non-invasive and painless. Does not rely on chemicals, ideal for long term use.
COZING-T05 physical therapy program
|
Condition |
Wavelength |
Power |
Mode |
Time |
Frequency |
Treatment Course |
|
Intervertebral Disc Disease |
808nm (16 diodes) |
High (250mW) |
Pulsed |
8-10 mins/site |
Medium-High |
3x/week × 6 weeks |
|
Lumbosacral Disease |
808nm (16 diodes) |
High (250mW) |
Pulsed |
10-12 mins |
High |
3x/week × 8 weeks |
|
Meningitis |
650nm (9 diodes) |
Low (5mW) |
Continuous |
5-7 mins |
Low |
Daily × 5 days (acute) |
|
Myositis |
808nm + 650nm combo |
Medium-High |
Pulsed |
6-8 mins |
Medium |
Daily × 5 days, then 2x/week |
|
Peripheral Nerve Injury |
650nm (9 diodes) |
Medium |
Pulsed |
7-9 mins |
Medium |
3x/week × 4 weeks |
|
Rehabilitation |
808nm (16 diodes) |
High (250mW) |
Alternating* |
10-15 mins |
Medium-High |
3x/week × 6-12 weeks |
Clinical studies
BACKGROUND: Laser therapy has been proposed as a physical therapy for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders and has gained popularity due to the lack of side effects following treatment. However, its true effectiveness remains controversial, as some clinical trials have reported that laser is ineffective in treating pain.
METHODS: In this systematic review, we explored the clinical effectiveness of low-intensity laser therapy (LLLT) for the treatment of arthralgia. Clinical trials for arthralgia that met the following criteria were included: laser irradiation of the joint area, a PEDro scale score of at least 5, and a visual analog scale (VAS) to measure the effectiveness of the trial. To assess the overall effectiveness of all included clinical trials, the mean weighted difference in pain change on the VAS was used.
RESULTS: MEDLINE was the primary source for the literature search. Following the literature search, 22 trials related to arthralgia were selected. 22 trials (1014 patients) had a mean methodological quality score of 7.96 on the PEDro scale; 11 trials reported a positive impact and 11 reported a negative impact. The mean weighted difference in VAS pain change was 13.96 mm (95% CI, 7.24-20.69) in favor of the active LLLT group. When we considered only clinical trials in which the energy dose was within the dose range recommended in the Bjordal et al. 2003 review and the World Association for Laser Therapy (WALT) dose recommendations, the mean effect sizes were 19.88 and 21.05 mm in favor of the true LLLT group, respectively.
CONCLUSION: This review suggests that arthro-laser therapy reduces pain in patients. Furthermore, when we limit the energy dose of laser therapy to the dose window recommended by previous studies, we can expect more reliable pain-relieving treatments.
Hot Tags: pain relief laser therapy device, China pain relief laser therapy device manufacturers, suppliers, factory, light therapy for arthritic knees, knee massager for pain relief, cold laser for pain, laser therapy for ankle sprain, light therapy chiropractic, cold laser therapy chiropractic
