Photo Bio Modulation Laser

• Body pain relief,Soft tissue injuries
• Diminish inflammations, Wounds&Ulcers, Osteoarthritis, Acupuncture, Rehabilitation therapy
• Joint&soft tissue injuries, Neck&Back, Strains & sprains, Frozen shoulder,Tennis/Golfer Elbow, Sciatica, Knee/foot pain, Achilles Tendency

1. Clinical trial results demonstrating approximately 92% therapeutic efficacy.

2. Red light therapy employs non-invasive irradiation, devoid of any adverse effects, a completely eco-friendly physical therapy.

3. CE certification and patent protection

4. Utilization of imported laser diodes guarantees superior laser output quality.

5. Compact dimensions facilitate portability, enabling treatment virtually anywhere.

6. UBC port and adapter,simply connect to a power bank/phone.

Photobiological pain relief laser is the application of light (usually a low powered laser or LED typically power range of (10mW–500mW). Light with a wavelength in the red to near infrared region of the spectrum (660nm–905nm), is generally employed because these wavelengths have the ability to penetrate skin, and soft/hard tissues and are proven in clinical trials to have a good effect on pain, inflammation and tissue repair. The power density (irradiance) is usually between 5W/cm2 and is applied to an injury or to a painful site for 30–60 seconds a few times a week for several weeks. The result is a reduction of inflammation, pain relief and accelerated tissue regeneration.

Overview

This scoping review analyzed the optimal doses of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) photomodulation for neuromusculoskeletal conditions. The goal of this descriptive literature review was to compile the knowledge regarding dosage variables and their impact on outcomes for these conditions, aiming to establish how reported dosage consistency contributes to the effectiveness of LLLT.



Methods

Data from the selected articles were input into a Microsoft Excel workbook. We identified outcome measures by reviewing abstracts or full texts of each article and recorded additional LLLT treatment parameters. Frequency counts were conducted on ordinal data, and descriptive statistics were computed for continuous data. Articles were categorized based on their outcomes (positive clinical outcomes vs. no change). Using IBM SPSS Statistics, we compared identified parameters using a nonparametric (Mann-Whitney U) test, with significant differences marked by P < .05.



Wavelength and Dosage

Research on LLLT for neck pain indicated that therapy response is dose-dependent on wavelength. For wavelengths of 820 to 830 nm, optimal doses ranged from 0.8 to 9 J applied over 15 to 180 seconds. For a wavelength of 904 nm, optimal doses were 0.8 to 4.2 J over 100 to 600 seconds. Dosages outside these ranges were ineffective.



Clinical Outcomes

LLLT was found effective for various conditions, comparable to pharmacologic treatments like celecoxib, meloxicam, diclofenac, and dexamethasone for neck pain. Pain relief was attributed to reduced inflammation and inflammatory markers at the joint (prostaglandin E, interleukin-1β, tumor necrosis factor α), inhibition of pain transmission at the neuromuscular junction, disruption of fast axonal flow, or inhibition of neural enzymes and neural conduction blocks. Studies showed that phototherapy parameters (wavelengths of 670 to 830 nm, dosages of 1 to 20 J/cm², output powers of 10 to 100 mW, and irradiation durations of 10 seconds to 2.7 minutes) effectively reduced pain and inflammation. LLLT also decreased delayed onset muscle soreness and enhanced recovery when administered before exercise.



Conclusion

Evidence suggests that short-term LLLT improves pain, physical function, and activity levels in individuals with knee osteoarthritis, likely due to reduced inflammation. However, further comparison of variables is needed to confirm these results.